The controversial subject of human to animal telepathy fascinates some, repels others, and is of no interest to many. Spiritual reasons can cause some individuals to reject the matter out of hand, while others may look into it as a way to expand their horizons. Animal psychics currently practice this art all over the world.
So what is the truth? This is a subject that is very subjective; in other words, it's not something that can be proved definitively in a laboratory. This doesn't mean that tests have not been done, however, or that there's no evidence for communication that's non-verbal and that does not depend on such things as body language.
In twentieth-century research done with true scientific method, possible emotional connection between animal and plant species was studied. It was demonstrated that plants could apparently respond to emotions experienced by animals. If tiny shrimp were thrown into boiling water, sensors on plants in adjoining rooms recorded a disturbance. Moving the plants farther away within the building did not lessen this response.
This is disturbing to those of us who eat plants, shrimp, and other organic foods. Of course, we have to eat something, and it does not seem possible to survive on inorganic material. We can be reassured by biblical accounts of the Creator providing plants for our food and Jesus partaking of the Passover lamb. We just have to come to terms with the fact that our food might be sentient.
So why should it be impossible to tap into the thoughts of 'higher' kinds of animals? (It was once thought that single-cell organisms, for instance, were less advanced than more complex organisms. The electro-magnetic microscope and DNA studies have changed that thinking.) It makes sense that creatures that can communicate with each other - like whales and dolphins and migrating birds - could communicate with humans.
Horses are subjects that psychics say they can communicate with. Many owners consult an animal communicator if they feel that they do not understand one of their equine companions. One owner was told that her new horse was wondering where his blanket was. It was true that the former owner had always blanketed the animal in the stall and that the new owner did not.
Christians are instructed not to ask for guidance from psychics, but to rely only on God and the Holy Spirit. However, there is a gift of the Spirit that gives wisdom and discernment. It seems probable that a godly person could both have and/or profit from this gift on behalf of animals. It is something to pray about, certainly.
Again, the response to animal telepathy is subjective. It's known that aborigines in Australia have a weird ability to communicate in non-verbal ways with each other and with hunted animals. It's a matter that's fascinating to explore or fairly easy to ignore, as you wish.
So what is the truth? This is a subject that is very subjective; in other words, it's not something that can be proved definitively in a laboratory. This doesn't mean that tests have not been done, however, or that there's no evidence for communication that's non-verbal and that does not depend on such things as body language.
In twentieth-century research done with true scientific method, possible emotional connection between animal and plant species was studied. It was demonstrated that plants could apparently respond to emotions experienced by animals. If tiny shrimp were thrown into boiling water, sensors on plants in adjoining rooms recorded a disturbance. Moving the plants farther away within the building did not lessen this response.
This is disturbing to those of us who eat plants, shrimp, and other organic foods. Of course, we have to eat something, and it does not seem possible to survive on inorganic material. We can be reassured by biblical accounts of the Creator providing plants for our food and Jesus partaking of the Passover lamb. We just have to come to terms with the fact that our food might be sentient.
So why should it be impossible to tap into the thoughts of 'higher' kinds of animals? (It was once thought that single-cell organisms, for instance, were less advanced than more complex organisms. The electro-magnetic microscope and DNA studies have changed that thinking.) It makes sense that creatures that can communicate with each other - like whales and dolphins and migrating birds - could communicate with humans.
Horses are subjects that psychics say they can communicate with. Many owners consult an animal communicator if they feel that they do not understand one of their equine companions. One owner was told that her new horse was wondering where his blanket was. It was true that the former owner had always blanketed the animal in the stall and that the new owner did not.
Christians are instructed not to ask for guidance from psychics, but to rely only on God and the Holy Spirit. However, there is a gift of the Spirit that gives wisdom and discernment. It seems probable that a godly person could both have and/or profit from this gift on behalf of animals. It is something to pray about, certainly.
Again, the response to animal telepathy is subjective. It's known that aborigines in Australia have a weird ability to communicate in non-verbal ways with each other and with hunted animals. It's a matter that's fascinating to explore or fairly easy to ignore, as you wish.
About the Author:
You can visit the website www.petstellthetruth.com for more helpful information about Is Animal Telepathy For Real?
0 comments:
Post a Comment